We live in a world that lacks the will power to
resolve issues that are important for our very survival. As a person that cares about the future the
proposals I suggested are only a small step in changing people’s attitudes on
climate change. I feel that you have missed the point that I was trying to
state, which is if we start of from something as little as gardening then it
could lead to a whole new generation that doesn’t rely on others to provide for
us. You stated that, “Pollans argument loses
impact by not discussing more realistic alternatives such as pursuing smart consumerism
and better environmental education for children.” In my opinion gardening is as realistic as it
gets and it does pursue smart consumerism for the following reason that I stated
in my article. It sets examples for others to depend on themselves and it can prosper,
creating a chain reaction that could eventually resolve the issues we face
today. I understand your views on this matter but I find that my proposals are in
fact realistic, and it could possibly make people bother.
No comments:
Post a Comment